Skip to content

AI Model Comparison for GitHub Copilot 🧠

This guide provides a comparison of different AI models that power GitHub Copilot, helping you understand their capabilities, strengths, and limitations.

Up to date model comparison from GitHub

Check the model comparison from GitHub for more up to date information

Model Comparison Table 📊

Model Best Use Cases Context Window Response Speed Accuracy & Reasoning Key Strengths Limitations
GPT-3.5 Turbo - Quick code suggestions
- Simple completions
- Routine tasks		 ~16k tokens Very fast Good for common patterns and standard code - Extremely responsive
- Low latency
- Efficient for routine coding		 - Less nuanced understanding
- May struggle with complex logic
- Limited context window
GPT-4o - Complex coding tasks
- Debugging
- Architecture suggestions		 ~128k tokens Moderate High accuracy across languages and frameworks - Balanced speed/quality
- Strong reasoning
- Good at explaining code		 - Higher resource usage
- Occasional over-generation
- May be slower than GPT-3.5
OpenAI O1 - Deep problem-solving
- Advanced debugging
- Complex algorithms		 ~128k tokens Slower Exceptional in solving highly intricate logic
Can reason step by step in a "thinking" mode		 - Extremely thorough
- Great for advanced debugging
- Chain-of-thought for tough problems		 - High latency
- Often limited usage quotas
- May "over-explain" or produce verbose solutions
OpenAI O3-mini - Coding-focused tasks
- Ideal for typical dev workflows		 ~200k tokens (input) Almost as fast as GPT-3.5
(optimized for code)		 Very high accuracy in coding benchmarks, surpassing O1 for standard tasks - Purpose-built for generating & refining code
- Balances speed + quality
- Large context window		 - Possibly less "general knowledge" than GPT-4
- High-resource usage if extremely large context is provided
Anthropic Claude 3.5 - General coding
- Large codebase comprehension
- Quick Q&A		 ~100k–200k tokens Fast in most scenarios
(significantly faster than O1)		 Very accurate on tasks like function implementation & debugging
Scores very high on coding benchmarks		 - Often provides well-structured, production-ready code
- Strong large-context handling
- Good explanations		 - Might need targeted prompts for extremely specialized frameworks
- Tends to produce longer textual responses
Anthropic Claude 3.7 - Similar to 3.5 but more refined
- Optional "Thinking Mode"		 ~100k–200k tokens Generally fast
(slightly slower in "Thinking Mode")		 On par with or better than Claude 3.5 in correctness
Good for iterative improvements & multi-step tasks		 - Supports agent-like advanced reasoning
- Can handle in-depth queries
- Large context window		 - Variations in output style if "Thinking Mode" is enabled
- Still slower than GPT-3.5 for trivial tasks
Google Gemini 2.0 "Flash" - Enterprise-scale dev tasks
- Massive codebases
- Refactoring, performance tuning		 Up to ~1M tokens Optimized for low latency
(can handle huge contexts with minimal slowdown)		 Highly promising accuracy (on par with GPT-4) – excels in code, math, & logic
(official benchmarks pending release)		 - Enormous context window for entire projects
- Good synergy with Google ecosystem
- Strong code optimization		 - Actual performance metrics still emerging
- Potentially high resource overhead for extremely large prompts

Quick Tips on Model Selection 💡

  1. Everyday Speed & Simplicity? 🏎️
    Stick to GPT-3.5 Turbo or O3-mini for near real-time code suggestions on routine tasks.

  2. Balanced Performance for Complex Needs? ⚖️
    GPT-4o or Claude 3.5/3.7 offer a strong combination of high accuracy, large context, and reasonable speed.

  3. Deep Problem-Solving & Debugging? 🔍
    OpenAI O1 (or O3-mini for coding-specific tasks) can handle intricate logic and step-by-step reasoning. Just be prepared for higher latency or usage limits.

  4. Massive Contexts or Enterprise Projects? 🏢
    Claude 3.5/3.7 and Google Gemini both feature enormous context windows (100k+ tokens), with Gemini Flash supporting up to 1M tokens.

  5. Model Switching 🔄

  6. It is often beneficial to switch models for specialized tasks (e.g., from GPT-4o to O1 for advanced debugging).
  7. Be aware of usage limits (especially for O1/O3-mini).
  8. Complex tasks may be slower on thorough models; use faster ones for routine completions.

References 📚

Below are some official product pages and announcements, which you can consult for more details and the latest updates:

  1. GitHub Copilot

  2. OpenAI

  3. Anthropic Claude

  4. Google Gemini

Disclaimer: The content here is for informational purposes only and based on available documentation and reports as of early 2025. Actual performance, quota limits, and feature sets may evolve over time. Check the model comparison from GitHub for more up to date information.